1. Siegel MJ,
Schmidt B,
Bradley D,
Suess C,
Hildebolt C.
Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
Radiology 2004;233:515-522
2. Guimaraes LS,
Fletcher JG,
Yu L,
et al.
Feasibility of dose reduction using novel denoising techniques for low kV (80 kV) CT enterography: optimization and validation.
Acad Radiol 2010;17:1203-1210
3. Yu L,
Bruesewitz M,
Thomas K,
Fletcher J,
Kofler J,
McCollough C.
Optimal tube potential for radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT: principles,
clinical implementations,
and pitfalls.
Radiographics 2011;31:835-848
4. Funama Y,
Awai K,
Nakayama Y,
et al.
Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: phantom study.
Radiology 2005;237:905-910
5. Heyer CM,
Mohr PS,
Lemburg SP,
Peters SA,
Nicolas V.
Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: prospective randomized study.
Radiology 2007;245:577-583
6. Nakayama Y,
Awai K,
Funama Y,
et al.
Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose,
contrast enhancement,
image quality,
and noise.
Radiology 2005;237:945-951
7. Schindera ST,
Nelson RC,
Mukundan S,
Jr.,
et al.
Hypervascular liver tumors: low tube voltage,
high tube current multi-detector row CT for enhanced detection--phantom study.
Radiology 2008;246:125-132
8. Ehman EC,
Guimarães LS,
Fidler JL,
et al.
Noise Reduction to Decrease Radiation Dose and Improve Conspicuity of Hepatic Lesions at Contrast-enhanced 80 kV Hepatic CT Using Projection Space Denoising.
Am J Roentgenol 2012; (in press)
9. Macari M,
Spieler B,
Kim D,
et al.
Dual-source dual-energy MDCT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: initial observations with data generated at 80 kVp and at simulated weighted-average 120 kVp.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:W27-32
10. Yanaga Y,
Awai K,
Nakaura T,
et al.
Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients weighing 70 kg or less: initial trial of compact-bolus dynamic CT with low-dose contrast material at 80 kVp.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1324-1331
11. Fletcher JG,
Takahashi N,
Hartman R,
et al.
Dual-Energy and Dual-Source CT: Is There a Role in the Abdomen and Pelvis? Radiol Clin North Am 2009;47:41-57
12. Yeh BM.
Abdominal CT at Low Peak Tube Potential Settings Brings Promises,
But New Rules Apply.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1322-1323
13. Yu L,
Liu X,
Leng S,
et al.
Radiation dose reduction in CT: Techniques and future perspective.
Imaging in Medicine 2009;1:65-84
14. EUR 16262.
European guidelines on Quality Criteria for computed tomography.
http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/htmlindex.htm,
accessed January 3,
2012.
15. Prakash P,
Kalra MK,
Kambadakone AK,
et al.
Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
Invest Radiol 2010;45:202-210
16. Sagara Y,
Hara AK,
Pavlicek W,
Silva AC,
Paden RG,
Wu Q.
Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:713-719
17. Guimaraes LS,
Fletcher JG,
Harmsen WS,
et al.
Appropriate patient selection at abdominal dual-energy CT using 80 kV: relationship between patient size,
image noise,
and image quality.
Radiology 2010;257:732-742
18. Winklehner A,
Goetti R,
Baumueller S,
et al.
Automated Attenuation-Based Tube Potential Selection for Thoracoabdominal Computed Tomography Angiography: Improved Dose Effectiveness.
Invest Radiol 2011;46:767-773
19. Yu L,
Li H,
Fletcher JG,
McCollough CH.
Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: A general strategy.
Med Phys 2010;37:234-243