1.TaÅŸkin F,
Köseoğlu K,
Unsal A,
ErkuÅŸ M,
OzbaÅŸ S,
Karaman C.
Sclerosing adenosis of the breast: radiologic appearance and efficiency of core needle biopsy. Diagn Interv Radiol.
2011 Dec;17(4):311-6.
doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.3785-10.2.
Epub 2011 Feb 15.
2.
Tavassoli FA.
Pathology of the breast.
Norwalk: Appleton and Lange,
1992; 93–97.
3.
Nielsen NS,
Nielsen BB.
Mammographic features of sclerosing adenosis presenting as a tumour.
Clin Radiol 1986; 37:371–373.
4.
Rasbridge SA,
Millis RR.
Carcinoma in situ involving sclerosing adenosis: a mimic ofinvasive breast carcinoma.
Histopathology 1995; 27:269–273.
5.
DiPiro PJ,
Gulizia JA,
Lester SC,
Meyer JE.
Mammographic and sonographic appearances
of nodular adenosis.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:31–34.
6.
Günhan-Bilgen I,
MemiÅŸ A,
Üstün EE,
Özdemir N,
Erhan Y.
Sclerosing adenosis:mammographic and ultrasonographic findings with clinical and histopathological
correlation.
Eur J Radiol 2002; 44:232–238.
7.
Tse GM,
Law BK,
Ma TK,
Chan AB,
Pang LM,
Chu WC,
Cheung HS.Hamartoma of the breast: a clinicopathological review. J Clin Pathol.
2002 Dec;55(12):951-4.8
8.Charpin C,
Mathoulin MP,
Andrac L,
et al.
Reappraisal of breast hamartomas: a morphological study of 41 cases.Pathol Res Pract 1994; 190:362–371.
9.
Hessler C,
Schnyder P,
Ozzello L.
Hamartoma of the breast:diagnostic observation of 16 cases.Radiology 1978; 126:95–98.10.
10.
Kryvenko ON1,
Chitale DA,
VanEgmond EM,
Gupta NS,
Schultz D,
Lee MW.
Angiolipoma of the female breast: clinicomorphological correlation of 52 cases.
Int J Surg Pathol. 2011 Feb;19(1):35-43.