1.
Young Jun Choi,
Jeong Kon Kim,
Namkug Kimet al.
Functional MR Imaging of Prostate Cancer,
RadioGraphics 2007; 27:63–77; Published online 10.1148/rg.271065078
2.
J.
O.
Barentsz,
J.Richenberg,
R.
Clements et al.
ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012,
European Radiology,
vol.
22,no.
4,
pp.746–757,
2012; DOI 10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y
3.
Caroline M.
A.
Hoeks,
Jelle O.
Barentsz,
Thomas Hambrock et al.
Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection,
Localization,
and Staging,
Radiology: Volume 261,
2011; 46-66
4.
M.
Röthke,
D.
Blondin,
H.-P.
Schlemmer,
T.
Franiel PI-RADS Classification: Structured Reporting for MRI of the Prostate,
Siemens Magnetom Flash,
4/2013,
Astro edition,
30-38
5.
J.
G.
R.
Bomers and J.
O.
Barentsz Standardization of Multiparametric Prostate MR Imaging Using PI-RADS,
Hindawi Publishing Corporation,
BioMed Research International,
Volume 2014,
Article ID 431680,
9 pages,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/431680
6.
Hedvig Hricak,
Georges C.
Dooms,
John E.
McNeal et al.
MR Imaging of the Prostate Gland: Normal Anatomy,
AJR 148:51-58,
January 1987,
0361-803X/87/1481-0051
7.
McNeal JE.
The zonal anatomy of the prostate,
Prostate 1981; 2 (1): 35-49 (abstract).
8.
Amin M.,
Khalid A.,
Tazeen N.,
Yasoob M.
Zonal Anatomy of Prostate,
Annals Vol 16.
No.
3 Jul.
– Sept.
2010,
138-142,
http://www.annalskemu.org/journal/index.php/annals/article/view/212/175
9.
Hricak H ,
Williams RD ,
Spring DB et al.
Anatomy and pathology of the male pelvis by magnetic resonance imaging,
AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983 ; 141 ( 6 ): 1101 – 1110
10.
Cruz M ,
Tsuda K ,
Narumi Y et al .
Characterization of low-intensity lesions in the peripheral zone of prostate on pre-biopsy endorectal coil MR imaging,
Eur Radiol 2002 ; 12 ( 2 ): 357 – 365,
DOI 10.1007/s003300101044
11.
White S,
Hricak H,
Forstner R et al.
Prostate cancer: effect of postbiopsy hemorrhage on interpretation of MR images,
Radiology 1995;195:385–390.
12.
Qayyum A ,
Coakley FV ,
Lu Y et al .
Organ confined prostate cancer: effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging,
AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004 ; 183 ( 4 ): 1079 – 1083
13.
Sadhna Verma,
Baris Turkbey,
Naira Muradyan et al.
Overview of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Management,
AJR:198,
2012; 1277-1288,
DOI:10.2214/AJR.12.8510
14.
Yamashita Y,
Baba T,
Baba Y et al.
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of uterine cervical cancer: pharmacokinetic analysis with histopathologic correlation and its importance in predicting the outcome of radiation therapy,
Radiology 2000; 216:803–809.
15.
Engelbrecht MR,
Huisman HJ,
Laheij RJ et al.
Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging,
Radiology 2003; 229:248–254
16.
Barentsz JO,
Jager G,
Mugler JP 3rd et al.
Staging urinary bladder cancer: value of T1-weighted three-dimensional magnetization prepared-rapid gradient-echo and two-dimensional spin-echo sequences,
AJR 1995; 164:109–115
17.
Fütterer JJ,
Engelbrecht MR,
Huisman HJ et al.
Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrastenhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers,
Radiology 2005; 237:541–549
18.
Jeong Kon Kim,
Seong Sook Hong,
Young Jun Choi et al.
Wash-In Rate on the Basis of Dynamic Contrast- Enhanced MRI: Usefulness for Prostate Cancer Detection and Localization,
J.
Magn.
Reson.
Imaging 2005;22:639–646.
19.
K.
N.
Nagel,
M.
G.
Schouten,
T.
Hambrock et al.
Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer by using diffusionweightedMRimaging andMR-guided biopsy at 3 T,
Radiology,
vol.
267,
no.
1,
pp.
164–172,
2013.
20.
Kim CK ,
Park BK ,
Kim B .
High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2,
AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010 ; 194 (1): W33 – W37.
21.
Katahira K ,
Takahara T ,
Kwee TC et al.
Ultra-high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: evaluation in 201 cases with histopathological correlation,
Eur Radiol 2011; 21 (1): 188 – 196.
22.
Chiho Sato,
Shinji Naganawa,
Tatsuya Nakamura et al.
Differentiation of Noncancerous Tissue and Cancer Lesions by Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Transition and Peripheral Zones of the Prostate,
J.
Magn.
Reson.
Imaging 2005;21:258–262.
23.
Meltem Esen,
Mehmet Ruhi Onur,
Nusret Akpolat et al.
Utility of ADC measurement on diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiation of prostate cancer,
normal prostate and prostatitis,
Quant Imaging Med Surg 2013;3(4):210-216.
24.
Daniel Portalez,
Pierre Mozer,
Francois Cornud et al.
Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Scoring System for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Cohort of Repeat Biopsy Patients,
European Urology 62 (2012) 986 – 996
25.
American Joint Committee on Cancer/Prostate Cancer Staging/7th edition,
https://cancerstaging.org/references-tools/quickreferences/Documents/ProstateSmall.pdf
26.
David Bonekamp,
Michael A.
Jacobs,
Riham El-Khouli et al.
Advancements in MR Imaging of the Prostate: From Diagnosis to Interventions,
RadioGraphics 2011; 31:677–703,
Published online 10.1148/rg.313105139.