1. WHO.
Stroke--1989.
Recommendations on stroke prevention,
diagnosis,
and therapy.
Report of the WHO Task Force on Stroke and other Cerebrovascular Disorders.
Stroke 1989;20:1407-31.
2. Taylor TN,
Davis PH,
Torner JC,
Holmes J,
Meyer JW,
Jacobson MF.
Lifetime Cost of Stroke in the United States.
Stroke 1996;27:1459-1466.
3. Bonita R.
Epidemiology of stroke.
The Lancet 1992;339:342-344.
4. Saposnik G,
Del Brutto OH,
Diseases ftISoC.
Stroke in South America: A Systematic Review of Incidence,
Prevalence,
and Stroke Subtypes.
Stroke 2003;34:2103-2107 doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000088063.74250.db.
5. Silva FA,
Zarruk JG,
Quintero C,
Arenas W,
Rueda-Clausen CF,
Silva SY,
Estupiñán AM.
Enfermedad cerebrovascular en Colombia.
Revista Colombiana de Cardiología 2006;13:85-89.
6. Díaz Cabezas R,
Ruano Restrepo MI.
Conocimiento de síntomas y factores de riesgo de enfermedad cerebro vascular en una población urbana colombiana.
Acta Neurológica Colombiana 2011;27:195-204.
7. Silva-Sieger F,
Arenas-Borda W,
Zarruk JG,
Restrepo J,
Bernal-Pacheco O,
RamÌrez S,
LÛpez-Jaramillo P.
Factores asociados al tiempo de consulta en pacientes con enfermedad cerebrovascular isquÈmica.
RevNeurol;44:0259-0264.
8. Kulcsar M,
Gilchrist S,
George MG.
Improving Stroke Outcomes in Rural Areas Through Telestroke Programs: An Examination of Barriers,
Facilitators,
and State Policies.
Telemed.
J.
E.
Health 2013;20:3-10 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0048.
9. McLaughlin PD,
Moloney F,
O'Neill SB,
James K,
Crush L,
Flanagan O,
Maher MM,
Wyse G,
Fanning N.
CT of the head for acute stroke: Diagnostic performance of a tablet computer prior to intravenous thrombolysis.
Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology 2017.
10. Panughpath S,
Kumar S,
Kalyanpur A.
Utility of mobile devices in the computerized tomography evaluation of intracranial hemorrhage.
Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 2013;23:4-7.
11. Tewes S,
Rodt T,
Marquardt S,
Evangelidou E,
Wacker FK,
von Falck C.
Evaluation of the use of a tablet computer with a high-resolution display for interpreting emergency CT scans.
RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 2013;185:1063-9.
12. Park JB,
Choi HJ,
Lee JH,
Kang BS.
An Assessment of the iPad 2 as a CT Teleradiology Tool Using Brain CT with Subtle Intracranial Hemorrhage Under Conventional Illumination.
J.
Digit.
Imaging 2013;26:683-690.
13. Yoshimura K,
Nihashi T,
Ikeda M,
Ando Y,
Kawai H,
Kawakami K,
Kimura R,
Okada Y,
Okochi Y,
Ota N,
Tsuchiya K,
Naganawa S.
Comparison of Liquid Crystal Display Monitors Calibrated With Gray-Scale Standard Display Function and With γ 2.2 and iPad: Observer Performance in Detection of Cerebral Infarction on Brain CT.
AJR 2013;200:1304-1309.
14. Bhatia A,
Patel S,
Pantol G,
Wu Y-Y,
Plitnikas M,
Hancock C.
Intra and Inter-Observer Reliability of Mobile Tablet PACS Viewer System vs.
Standard PACS Viewing Station-Diagnosis of Acute Central Nervous System Events.
Open Journal of Radiology 2013;Vol.03No.02:8.
15. Pexman JHW,
Barber PA,
Hill MD,
Sevick RJ,
Demchuk AM,
Hudon ME,
Hu WY,
Buchan AM.
Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for Assessing CT Scans in Patients with Acute Stroke.
American Journal of Neuroradiology 2001;22:1534-1542.
16. Nelson JC,
Pepe MS.
Statistical description of interrater variability in ordinal ratings.
Stat Methods Med Res 2000;9:475-496.
17. ACR.
American College of Radiology Standard for Teleradiology.
Res.
35.
1998.
18. NEMA.
Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine.
Part 14: Grayscale Standrad Display Function 2001.
19. Mun EY.
Rater Agreement – Weighted Kappa: John Wiley & Sons,
Ltd,
2005.
20. Landis JR,
Koch GG.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.
Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
21. TG18 A.
Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: Executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.
2005.
22. Mullins ME,
Lev MH,
Schellingerhout D,
Koroshetz WJ,
Gonzalez RG.
Influence of Availability of Clinical History on Detection of Early Stroke Using Unenhanced CT and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging.
AJR 2002;179:223-228.
23. Feinstein AR,
Cicchetti DV.
High agreement but low Kappa: I.
the problems of two paradoxes.
J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:543-549.