Keywords:
Cardiovascular system, Vascular, MR-Angiography, Technical aspects
Authors:
P. Talarczyk, J. Weir-McCall, L. Brown, J. Summersgill, M. Bonnici-Mallia, S. C. Chin, F. khan, G. Houston; Dundee/UK
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2018/C-2403
References
1.
Huybrechts SAM,
Devos DG,
Vermeersch SJ,
Mahieu D,
Achten E,
de Backer TLM,
Segers P,
van Bortel LM.
Carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity: a comparison of real travelled aortic path lengths determined by MRI and superficial measurements.
Journal of hypertension.
2011;29(8):1577–82.
2.
Van Bortel LM,
Laurent S,
Boutouyrie P,
Chowienczyk P,
Cruickshank JK,
De Backer T,
Filipovsky J,
Huybrechts S,
Mattace-Raso FUS,
Protogerou AD,
Schillaci G,
Segers P,
Vermeersch S,
Weber T.
Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity.
Journal of Hypertension.
2012;30(3):445–448.
3.
Weber T,
Ammer M,
Rammer M,
Adji A,
O’Rourke MF,
Wassertheurer S,
Rosenkranz S,
Eber B.
Noninvasive determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity depends critically on assessment of travel distance: a comparison with invasive measurement.
Journal of hypertension.
2009;27(8):1624–30.
4.
Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness’ Collaboration.
Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: “establishing normal and reference values”.
European heart journal.
2010;31(19):2338–50.