Keywords:
Dosimetry, Digital radiography, Radioprotection / Radiation dose, Dosimetric comparison
Authors:
E. Alukić, N. Mekis; Ljubljana/SI
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2018/C-2413
References
1.
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs (2006).
The use of dental radiographs: Update and recommendations.
Association report. JADA 137 (9): 1304–1312.
http://www.ncradiation.net/xray/documents/dental%20ADArad.pdf.
<24.1.2015>
2.
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs (2001).
An update on radiographic practices: information and recommendations.
Association report. Jada 132(12): 234 –8.
http://www.limoli.com/fileTamer/An%20Update%20On%20Radiographic%20Practices.pdf.
<24.1.2015>
3.
Langlais R (2004).
A special report – Rectangular collimation,
No longer a matter of choice.
Interactive Diagnostic Imaging.
http://www.idixray.com/media/pdf/Tru-Align%20Special%20Report.pdf.
<24.1.2015>
4.
Parrott LA,
Ng SY (2011).
Research – A comparison between bitewing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: a retrospective study.
Dentomaxillofac Radiology 40 (2): 102–109.
5.
Medič M,
Žibert J,
Mekiš N (2013).
Radiološka tehnologija 1,
učbenik za študente radiološke tehnologije.
Ljubljana: Zdravstvena fakulteta.
6.
Kodak Dental Systems (2007).
Radiation safety in dental radiography.
Carestream Health.
CAT 129.
http://www.ncradiation.net/xray/documents/radsafetyDent.pdf.
<24.1.2015>
7.
European Communities (2004).
Radiation protection 136 – European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology.
The safe use of radiographs in dental practice.
Issue N 136.
8.
Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland and Health Service Executive (2011).
The Use of Lead Aprons in Dental Radiology.
Dublin,
Ireland.