Keywords:
Dysplasias, Developmental disease, Screening, Diagnostic procedure, Ultrasound, Paediatric, Musculoskeletal joint
Authors:
F. Bondini1, E. Zanelli2, G. Como1, I. Mauro1, L. Cattarossi1, R. Girometti1, C. Zuiani1; 1Udine/IT, 2Udine, italia/IT
DOI:
10.26044/ecr2019/C-1579
Methods and materials
US technique:
The study was performed and evaluated by a radiologist and a neonatologist,
who used two ultrasound machines (GE Logiq E9 XD and Hitachi Healthcare’s Prosound Alpha 7) and linear highest-frequency transducers (> 7.5 MHz),
which were used freehand.
A specific pillow was used to maintain newborns in lateral decubitus position,
with the hips flexed from 30° to 45º.
Classification:
We used Graf’s method for ultrasound measures and for typization of hips [Table 1].
In particular,
we obtained anatomic plane and evaluated the centering of femoral head,
bony roof,
cartilage roof,
with respective alpha and beta angles,
and bony rim [Fig 1].
Study population:
We retrospectively reviewed hip US examinations of 578 patients (pz.),
performed between August 2016 and February 2018 within an institutional screening program including newborns at risk for DDH.
In our study,
risk factors considered were: breech presentation,
familiarity for DDH,
large to born,
twins,
asymmetry of the skin folds,
click of the hip,
joint stiffness or laxity and congenital lower limb abnormalities.
Among these,
73 infants (12.6%) presented DDH,
subsequently divided into two subgroups,
i.e.
those with pOT (control group),
and those with nOT (target group).
We calculated the prevalence of DDH and compared it between the two subgroups,
then we used Fisher’s exact test for statistic evaluation.