Keywords:
Breast, Oncology, Mammography, Ultrasound, Comparative studies, Treatment effects, Cancer, Outcomes
Authors:
W. Ahmad1, E. Tahir1, S. Aqeel1, I. ZAHEER2; 1Lahore/PK, 231951/SA
DOI:
10.26044/ecr2019/C-2113
References
1. Kopans D.B.
Negative mammographic and US findings do not help exclude breast cancer. Radiology. 2002;222(3):857–858.
2. Hille H,
Vetter M,
Hackelöer BJ.
Re-evaluating the role of breast ultrasound in current diagnostics of malignant breast lesions] Ul-traschall Med. 2004;25(6):411–417.
3. Vercauteren L.D,
Kessels A.G,
van der Weijden T,
Koster D,
Severens J.L,
van Engelshoven J.M,
et al.
Clinical impact of the use of additional ultrasonography in diagnostic breast imaging. Eur.
Radiol. 2008;18(10):2076–2084.
4. Boyd N.F,
Rommens J.M,
Vogt K,
et al.
Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6:798–808.
5. American College of Radiology. Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3rd ed.
Reston,
V.A: American College of Radiology; 1998.
6. Houssami N,
Irwig L,
Simpson J.M,
McKessar M,
Blome S,
Noakes J.
The influence of knowledge of mammography findings on the accuracy of breast ultrasound in symptomatic women. Breast J. 2005;11(3):167–172.
7. Saarenmaa I,
Salminen T,
Geiger U,
et al.
The effect of age and density of the breast on the sensitivity of breast cancer diagnostic by mammography and ultrasonography. Breast Cancer Res.
Treat. 2001; 67:117–123.