Whole-body examinations in PET/CT were performed on a sample of 368 patients,
203 males and 165 females.
Mean values,
standard deviation (SD),
minimum and maximum values of patient’s age,
weight,
height,
body mass index (BMI) administered activities,
CTDIvol and DLP,
are presented in Table 1.
The mean,
median and 75th percentiles for CTDIvol were 5.12 mGy,
4.59 mGy and 6.03 mGy,
respectively.
The mean value of activity was 355.05 MBq,
as well the median was 358.45 MBq.
The estimation of Pearson’s coefficient revealed a strong positive correlation between the following pair of parameters.
The Pearson’s coefficient (r) between BMI and CTDIvol was estimated 0.84,
BMI and activity was 0.69,
CTDIvol and activity was 0.65,
and CTDIvol and BMI was 0.78.
800x600
Table 1. Mean values ± standard deviation (SD),
minimum and maximum values of patient’s age,
weight,
height,
BMI,
administered activity,
CTDIvol and DLP.
|
Age (yrs) |
Weight (kg) |
Height (cm) |
BMI (kg/m2) |
CTDIvol (mGy) |
DLP (mGy*cm) |
Activity (MBq) |
Mean±SD |
59.36±15.57
|
74.67±16.19 |
169.44±8.56 |
26±4.98 |
5.12±1.81 |
460.11±199.19 |
355.05±71.39 |
Min-Max |
16-92 |
38-125 |
145-195 |
14-43 |
3.24-12.8 |
113.93-1374.94 |
152.1-592.9 |
75th percentiles |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6.03 |
- |
394.23 |
Figure 1 illustrates the distribution of CTDIvol values according to BMI of the patients.

Fig. 1: Distribution of CTDIvol values.
Figure 1: Distribution of CTDIvol values.
Figures 2 and 3 display frequency histograms of CTDIvol values for PET/CT whole body examinations (n=368) and the injected 18F-FDG activity,
respectively.
In both cases,
the distribution is skewed and asymmetric with a main peak,
tail and some extreme values.[5]

Fig. 2: Histogram of CTDIvol values for PET/CT whole body examinations.
Figure 2: Histogram of CTDIvol values for PET/CT whole body examinations.

Fig. 3: Histogram of injected FDG activity.
Figure 3: Histogram of injected FDG activity.