Keywords:
Quality assurance, Embolism / Thrombosis, Education and training, Radiation safety, Outcomes analysis, Health policy and practice, RIS, CT-Angiography, Vascular, Pulmonary vessels, Emergency
Authors:
P. GUPTA1, M. Saif2, Z. Munir2, A. Makki2; 1DUBAI, No/AE, 2DUBAI/AE
DOI:
10.26044/ecr2019/C-3473
References
1 Miller AC,
Fennerty A.
British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.
Thorax 2003;58:470–83.
2 Lavorini F,
Di Bello V,
De Rimini ML,
et al.
Diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism: a multidisciplinary approach.
Multidiscip Respir Med 2013;8:75–83.
3.
Rogg JG,
De Neve JW,
Huang C,
et al.
The triple work-up for emergency department patients with acute chest pain: how often does it occur? J Emerg Med 2011;40:128-34.
4.
Bettmann MA,
Baginski SG,
White RD,
et al.
ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) acute chest pain–suspected pulmonary embolism.
J Thorac Imaging 2012;27:W28-31.
5.
Wells PS,
Ginsberg JS,
Anderson DR,
et al.
Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Ann Intern Med 1998;129:995–1005.
6 Konstantinides SV,
Torbicki A,
Agnelli G.
2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism.
Eur Heart J 2014;35:3033–73.