Type:
Educational Exhibit
Keywords:
Neuroradiology brain, Radiographers, MR, Equipment, Education and training
Authors:
U. Poudel1, S. Maharjan1, S. Mukhi2, R. Chaudhary2, S. C. Yadav2; 1Kathmandu/NP, 2Bhairahawa/NP
DOI:
10.26044/ecr2021/C-10566
Findings and procedure details
The mean height, depth, width, and volume of the pituitary gland were 5.83±0.77 mm, 9.74±1.22 mm, and 12.98±1.50 mm and 383.59±78.72 mm3, respectively. According to gender, there was a statistically significant difference in height, U=954.00, p=0.042, and volume, t(98)=2.05, p=0.042. whereas there were no statistically significant differences in depth, U=1257.50, p=0.956, and width, t(98)=1.93, p=0.056 as shown in Table 1.
According to age group, there were no statistically significant differences in depth, H(6)=2.181, p=0.902 and volume, F(6,93)=2.008, p=0.072. However, there was a statistically significant difference in height at H(6)=23.61, p=0.001 and in width at F(6,93)=2.558, p=0.024 as shown in Table 2. Pairwise comparison post hoc correction showed that below 20 and 70 above years of age, 20-30 and 70 above years of age, and 20-30 and 40-50 years of age groups had different heights of the pituitary at p<0.05. Again, in the case of the width of the pituitary gland, the pairwise comparison post hoc correction method yielded below 20 and 60-70 age groups were different at p<0.05.