Keywords:
Arteriosclerosis, Outcomes analysis, Decision analysis, MR, MR physics, Cardiovascular system, Cardiac
Authors:
N. H. Prakken1, B. M. Swinkels 2, R. van Dijk1, S. A. Rebergen2, P. van Dijkman2, D. rijlaarsdam-hermsen2, T. A. M. Kaandorp2, M. Gutberlet3, P. van der Harst1, M. Oudkerk1, D. Kuijpers2; 1Groningen/NL, 2The Hague/NL, 3Leipzig/DE
References
1 Schwitter J,
Wacker CM,
Wilke N et al (2012) Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: The secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial).
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:61
2 Greenwood JP,
Maredia N,
Younger JF et al (2012) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial.
Lancet 379:453-460
3 Lipinski MJ,
McVey CM,
Berger JS,
Kramer CM,
Salerno M (2013) Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Am Coll Cardiol 62:826-838
4 Nandalur KR,
Dwamena BA,
Choudhri AF,
Nandalur MR,
Carlos RC (2007) Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.
J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1343-1353
5 Schwitter J,
Wacker CM,
van Rossum AC et al (2008) MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre,
multivendor,
randomized trial.
Eur Heart J 29:480-489
6 Schwitter J,
Wacker CM,
Wilke N et al (2013) MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs.
single-photon emission computed
tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre,
multivendor trial.
Eur Heart J 34:775-781