[1] Yaffe M.
J.
and Mainprize J.
(2011),
Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening.
Radiology: 258:98-105.
[2] Yaffe,
M.
J.,
J.
M.
Boone,
et al.
(2009).
"The myth of the 50-50 breast." Med Phys 36(12): 5437-5443.
[3] Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine,
IPEM Report 88 (2004): Guidance on the Establishment and Use of Diagnostic Reference Levels for Medical X-Ray Examinations,
York,
UK.
[4] D.
R.
Dance,
C.
L.
Skinner,
K.
C.
Young,
J.
R.
Beckett,
and C.
J.
Kotre,
“Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol,” Phys.
Med.
Biol.,
vol.
45,
no.
11,
p.
3225,
2000.
[5] D.
R.
Dance,
K.
C.
Young,
and R.
E.
van Engen,
“Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK,
European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.,” Phys.
Med.
Biol.,
vol.
56,
no.
2,
pp.
453–71,
Jan.
2011.
[6] D.
R.
Dance,
A.
K.
Thilander,
M.
Sandborg,
C.
L.
Skinner,
I.
A.
Castellano,
and G.
A.
Carlsson,
“Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast,
signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study,” Br J Radiol,
vol.
73,
no.
874,
pp.
1056–1067,
2000.
[7] D.
R.
Dance,
K.
C.
Young,
and R.
E.
van Engen,
“Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom,
European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols,” Phys Med Biol,
vol.
54,
no.
14,
pp.
4361–4372,
2009.
[8] D.
R.
Dance,
“Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose,” Phys Med Biol,
vol.
35,
no.
9,
pp.
1211–1219,
1990.