[1] International Commission on Radiological Protection.
ICRP 103: the 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection.
Ann ICRP 2007;37:330.
[2] Bjarnason TA,
Thakur Y,
Chakraborty S,
et al.
Canadian Association of Radiologists Radiation Protection Working Group: automated patient specific dose registries what are they and what are they good for? Can Assoc Radiol J 2015;66:192e7.
[3] International Atomic Energy Agency.
Quality assurance programme for computed tomography: diagnostic and therapy applications.
Available at: http://www.iaea.org/Publications/index.html; 2012.
[4] IPEM.
Guidance on the establishment and use of diagnostic reference levels for medical x-ray examinations.
IPEM Report 88.
2004.
[5] Wardlaw GM.
Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs): Concepts,
Canada,
and Constraints.
Montebello,
QC: Health Canada Medical Imaging Division; 2017.
[6] Health Canada.
Canadian computed tomography survey: national diagnostic reference levels.
Available at: http://www.healthycanadians.
gc.ca/publications/security-securite/canadian-computed-tomographysurvey-
2016-sondage-canadien-tomodensitometrie/alt/cct-survey-son
dage-ct-eng.pdf; 2016.
[7] Chen J,
Moir D.
An estimation of the annual effective dose to the Canadian population from medical CT examinations.
J Radiol Prot 2010;30:131e7.
[8] Shrimpton PC,
Hillier MC,
Meeson S,
Golding SJ.
Public Health England doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK 2011 Review.
Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/349188/PHE_CRCE_013.pdf; 2014.
[9] Kanal KM,
Butler PF,
Sengupta D,
Bhargavan-Chatfield M,
Coombs LP,
Morin RL.
U.S.
diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations.
Radiology 2017;284:120e33.
[10] Leswick DA,
Syed NS,
Dumaine CS,
Lim HJ,
Fladeland DA.
Radiation dose from diagnostic computed tomography in Saskatchewan.
Can Assoc Radiol J 2009;60:71e8.
[11] Dumaine CS,
Leswick DA,
Fladeland DA,
Lim HJ,
Toews LJ.
Changing radiation dose from diagnostic computed tomography examinations in Saskatchewan.
Can Assoc Radiol J 2012;63:183e91.
[12] Heliou R,
Normandeau L,
Beaudoin G.
Towards dose reduction in CT: patient radiation dose assessment for CT examinations at university health center in Canada and comparison with national diagnostic reference levels.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2012;148:202e10.
[13] Elbakri IA,
Kirkpatrick IDC.
Survey of clinical doses from computed tomography examinations in the Canadian province of Manitoba.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2013;157:525e35.
[14] MacGregor K,
Li I,
Dowdell T,
Gray BG.
Identifying institutional diagnostic reference levels for CT with radiation dose index monitoring software.
Radiology 2015;276:507e17.
[15] Thakur Y,
Bjarnason TA,
Baxter P,
Griffith M,
Eaton K.
Radiation dose
survey for common computed tomography exams: 2013 British Columbia results.
Can Assoc Radiol J 2016;67:88e95.
[16] Nassiri MA,
Rouleau M,
Despres P.
CT dose reduction: Approaches,
strategies and results from a province-wide program in Quebec.
J Radiol Prot 2016;36:346e62.
[17] Tonkopi E,
Manos D,
Tonkopi E,
Duffy S,
Abdolell M,
Manos D.
Diagnostic reference levels and monitoring practice can help reduce patient dose from CT examinations.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;208:1073e81.
[18] Ning P,
Zhu S,
Shi D,
Guo Y,
Sun M.
X-ray dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography using advanced iterative reconstruction algorithms.
PloS One 2014;9:e92568.
[19] Power SP,
Moloney F,
Twomey M,
James K,
O’Connor OJ,
Maher MM.
Computed tomography and patient risk: Facts,
perceptions and uncertainties.
World J Radiol 2016;8:902e15.