Background/introduction
Over the last decades,
manufacturers of multi-slice CT scanners have invested tremendous efforts to maintain high image qualities while reducing patient exposure to ionizing radiation [1,
2,
3,
4].
Although various studies have proven lower patient doses on latest CT scanners,
little is known about over-ranging [5,
6].
Indeed,
faster CT acquisitions and larger total collimations are expected to yield greater over-ranging potentially increasing the total scan length and thereby affecting DRLs.
Most manufacturers have introduced some features to limit over-ranging,
but their efficiency is...
Description of activity and work performed
Methods and materials:
CT exposure data of ~24250 patients,
collected between 2013 and 2018 by 9 medical physicists in more than 150 public and private French hospitals,
were retrospectively analysed.
Over-ranging was calculated as the difference between total exposed scan length and total imaged scan length ( Fig. 1 ).
Per each scanner,
mean over-ranging ± standard deviations were calculated.
Inclusion criteria were the availability of slice thickness,
collimation and pitch.
Over-ranging in fourteen different CT models from GE,
Philips and Siemens were compared.
The...
Conclusion and recommendations
The present study showed large variability in over-ranging among manufacturers and equipment models proving that additional care is still needed to limit at best unnecessary exposure.
For a same clinical indication,
the difference in over-ranging exceeded 5 cm for two ~4 cm total collimation CT models from two different manufacturers.
The present study may also be used to further expand local optimisation strategies and local/national DRLs defining good practices in terms of total imaged scan length accounting for over-ranging.
Personal/organisational information
I.
Rousselle1,
L.
Gonzalez1,
B.
Royer1,
C.
Mabit1,
N.
Rossetto1,
C.
Corbet1,
A.
Noel1,2,
F.
Dufay1,
J.
Farah3
1 Pôle de Physique Médicale,
C2i santé,
Cabinet de Consultants en Ingénierie de la Santé,
10 rue Paul Langevin - Parc d'Activités St Jacques II,
54320 Maxéville,
France.
2 Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (CRAN - UMR 7039),
Université de Lorraine - CNRS,
54500 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy,
France.
3 Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud,
C.H.U.
de Bicêtre,
78 rue du général Leclerc,
94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre,
France.
Corresponding...
References
[1] A.
J.
Van Der Molen,
W.
J.
H.
Veldkamp,
and J.
Geleijns,
“16-slice CT: achievable effective doses of common protocols in comparison with recent CT dose surveys”,
The British Journal of Radiology,
vol.
80,
no.
952,
pp.
248–255,
Apr.
2007.
[2] A.
J.
van der Molen,
A.
Schilham,
P.
Stoop,
M.
Prokop,
and J.
Geleijns,
“A national survey on radiation dose in CT in The Netherlands”,
Insights into Imaging,
vol.
4,
no.
3,
pp.
383–390,
Jun.
2013.
[3] A.
Vlassenbroek,
D.
Mehta,
and J....