1.
Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz.
Accessed at http://www.bfs.de/DE/themen/ion/anwendung-medizin/diagnostik/referenzwerte/referenzwerte_node.html;jsessionid=E7CE8CED7B3D090D7C41A464A032E8BF.1_cid382.
Accessed 04.01.2019.
2.
Council Directive 2013/59/EUROATOM.
Accessed at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32013L0059.
Accessed 04.01.2019.
3.
Nikupaavo U,
Kaasalainen T,
Reijonen V,
et al.
Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms.
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2015;204(1):117-23.
4.
Stewart FA,
Akleyev AV,
Hauer-Jensen M,
et al.
ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context.
Ann ICRP.
2012;41(1-2):1-322.
5.
McLaughlin DJ,
Mooney RB. Dose reduction to radiosensitive tissues in CT.
Do commercially available shields meet the users' needs? Clin Radiol.
2004;59(5):446-50.
6.
Wang J,
Duan X,
Christner JA,
et al.
Bismuth shielding,
organ-based tube current modulation,
and global reduction of tube current for dose reduction to the eye at head CT.
Radiology.
2012;262(1):191-8.
7.
Korn A,
Fenchel M,
Bender B,
et al.
Iterative reconstruction in head CT: image quality of routine and low-dose protocols in comparison with standard filtered back-projection.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.
2012;33(2):218-24.
8.
Korn A,
Bender B,
Fenchel M,
et al.
Sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction in head CT: improvement of objective and subjective image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction.
Eur J Radiol.
2013;82(9):1431-5.
9.
Kilic K,
Erbas G,
Guryildirim M,
et al.
Lowering the dose in head CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.
2011;32(9):1578-82.
10.
Stiller W. Basics of iterative reconstruction methods in computed tomography: A vendor-independent overview.
Eur J Radiol.
2018;109:147-54.