Congress:
EuroSafe Imaging 2020
Keywords:
Performed at one institution, Not applicable, Retrospective, Dosimetric comparison, Radiation effects, Dosimetry, Fluoroscopy, Radioprotection / Radiation dose, Action 5 - Performance indicators for radiation protection management
Authors:
S. Riga, M. M. J. Felisi, F. Campanaro, P. E. Colombo, F. Barbosa, A. G. Rampoldi, A. Torresin
DOI:
10.26044/esi2020/ESI-07597
References
[1] Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ. Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation on patients’ skin and hair. Radiology 2010;254(2):326–341. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2542082312.
[2] IEC 60601-2-43:2000 Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-43: Particular requirements for the safety of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures.
[3] Jones AK, Ensor JE, Pasciak AS. How accurately can the peak skin dose in fluoroscopy be determined using indirect dose metrics? Med Phys. 2014 Jul;41 (7) :071913. doi: 10.1118/1.4884020.
[4] National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. NCRP Report No. 168: Radiation dose management for fluoroscopically-guided interventional medical procedures, 2010.
[5] Calderoni F, Campanaro F, Colombo PE, Campoleoni M, De Mattia C, Rottoli F, Galetta G, Zucconi F, Pola A, Righini A, Triulzi F, Vanzulli A, Torresin A. Analysis of a multicentre cloud-based CT dosimetric database: preliminary results. Eur Radiol Exp 3, 27 (2019) doi:10.1186/s41747-019-0105-6
