1.- Singh S,
Kalra MK,
Ali Khawaja RD,
Padole A,
Pourjabbar S,
Lira D et al.
Radiation dose optimization and thoracic computed tomography.
Radiol Clin North Am.
2014;52:1-15.
2.- Szucs-Farkas Z,
Strautz T,
Patak MA,
et al.
Is body weight the most appropriate criterion to select patients eligible for low-dose pulmonary CT angiography? Analysis of objective and subjective image quality at 80kVp in 100 patients.
Eur Radiol 2009;19:1914-22.
3.- Viteri-Ramírez G,
García-Lallana A,
Simón-Yarza I,
Broncano J,
Ferreira M,
Pueyo JC et al.
Low radiation and low-contrast dose pulmonary CT angiography: Comparison of 80 kVp/60 ml and 100 kVp/80 ml protocols.
Clin Radiol.
2012;67:833-9.
4.- Fujimoto S,
Matsutani H,
Kondo T,
Sano T,
Kumamaru K,
Takase S et al.
Image quality and radiation dose stratified by patient heart rate for coronary 64- and 320-MDCT angiography.
Am J Roentgenol.
2013;200:765-70.
5.- Leipsic J,
Nguyen G,
Brown J,
Sin D,
Mayo JR.
A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Am J Roentgenol.
2010;195:1095-9.
6.- Honda O,
Takenaka D,
Matsuki M,
Koyama M,
Tomiyama N,
Murata K et al.
Image quality of 320-detector row wide-volume computed tomography with diffuse lung diseases: comparison with 64-detector row helical CT.
J Comput Assist Tomogr.
2012;36:505-11.
7.- P.
Assessment of patient dose in CT.
In: EUR.
European guidelines for multislice computed tomography funded by the European Commission 2004: contract number FIGMCT2000-20078-CT- TIP.
Luxembourg: European Commission,
2004:Appendix C.