Congress:
EuroSafe Imaging 2017
Keywords:
Cancer, Physics, Mammography, Radiation physics, Breast, Action 3 - Image quality assessment based on clinical indications, Action 4 - Quality of radiological equipment, Quality assurance
Authors:
I. Fitton, J. Minassian, A. Noël
DOI:
10.1594/esi2017/ESI-0016
References
1Niklason LT.,
Christian BT.,
Niklason LE.,
et al.
Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.
Radiology 1997; Nov.
205(2):399-406.
2Diekmann F.,
Bick U.
Breast tomosynthesis.
Seminars in Ultrasound,
CT,
and MRI.
2011; 32(4):281-287.
3Gilbert FJ.,
Tucker L.,
Gillan MG.,
et al.
The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme-a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(4):i-xxv,
1-136.
4Greenberg JS., Javitt MC,
Katzen J,
et al.
Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Sep;203(3):687-93.
5Breast Tomosynthesis Quality Control Protocol (phys.-techn.) version 1 .0.
March 2015.
http://www.euref.org.
6Strudley CJ.,
Young KC.,
Looney P.,
et al.
Development and experience of quality control methods for digital breast tomosynthesis systems.
Br J Radiol. 2015 Dec;88(1056):20150324.
7Sechopoulos I.
A review of breast tomosynthesis.
Part I.
The image acquisition process.
Med.
Phys.
2013 Jan; 40(1): 014301-1.
8Fezzani KL.,
Sage J.,
Fitton I.,
et al.
Digital breast tomosynthesis: dose and image quality characterization.
Phys.
Med.
2016 Sep;32(3):276.