Keywords:
Breast, Mammography, Digital radiography
Authors:
Y. Y. Lim, R. Borgen, S. Gadde, S. Bundred, E. Hurley; Manchester/UK
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2010/C-0298
References
Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft copy reading—Oslo I study. Radiology. 2003 Dec; 229(3):877-84.
Lewin JM, D’Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, et al. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR AM J Roentgenol. 2002 Sep;179(3):671-7.
Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology. 2007 Sep;244(3):708-17.
Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1773-83. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):376-83.
CG41 Familial breast cancer: the classification and care of women at risk of familial breast cancer in primary, secondary and tertiary care. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Oct 2006.