1) Takeuchi M,
et al.
Pathologies of the uterine endometrial cavity: usual and unusual manifestations and pitfalls on magnetic resonance imaging.
Eur Radiol 2005;15:2244-55.
2) Frei KA,
et al.
Staging endometrial cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging.
J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:850-5.
3) Manfredi R,
et al.
Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning.
Radiology 2004;231:372-8.
4) Boronow RC,
et al.
Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study.
Obstet Gynecol 1984;63:825-32.
5) Scoutt LM,
et al.
Clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma: pitfalls in preoperative assessment with MR imaging.
Work in progress.
Radiology 1995;194:567-72.
6) Sala E,
et al.
MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix.
Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1577-1587.
7) Freeman SJ,
et al.
The revised FIGO staging system for uterine malignancies: implications for MR imaging.
Radiographics.
2012;32:1805-27.
8) Beddy P,
et al.
FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: added benefits of MR imaging.
Radiographics.
2012;32:241-54.
9) Sala E,
et al.
Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer.
Eur Radiol.
2011;21:468-73.
10) Wakefield JC,
et al.
New MR Techniques in Gynecologic Cancer.
AJR.
2013;200:249-60.
11) Koyama T,
et al.
Functional MR imaging of the female pelvis.
J Magn Reson Imaging.
2007;25:1101-12.
12) Tamai K,
et al.
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer.
J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:682-7.
13) Inada Y,
et al.
Body diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer: Is it helpful in the detection of cancer in nonenhanced MR imaging? Eur J Radiol 2009;70:122-7.
14) Fujii S,
et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions: initial results.
Eur Radiol 2008;18:384-9.
15) Shen SH,
et al.
Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging with parallel technique in assessment of endometrial cancer.
AJR.
2008;190:481-8.
16) Takeuchi M,
et al.
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer: differentiation from benign endometrial lesions and preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion.
Acta Radiol.
2009;50:947-53.
17) Rechichi G,
et al.
Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with tumor grade,
depth of myometrial invasion,
and presence of lymph node metastases.
AJR.
2011;197:256-62.
18) Bharwani N,
et al.
Diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of tumour grade in endometrial cancer.
Br J Radiol.
2011;84:997-1004.
19) Seo JM,
et al.
Endometrial cancer: Utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with background body signal suppression at 3T.
J Magn Reson Imaging.
2012.
[Epub ahead of print]
20) Cao K,
et al.
Apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion weighted MRI in endometrial carcinoma-Relationship with local invasiveness.
Eur J Radiol.
2012 ;81:1926-30.
21) Hori M,
et al.
MR imaging of endometrial carcinoma for preoperative staging at 3.0 T: comparison with imaging at 1.5 T.
J Magn Reson Imaging.
2009;30:621-30.
22) Beddy P,
et al.
Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion and overall staging in endometrial cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Radiology.
2012;262:530-7.
23) Sala E,
The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the female pelvis.
Eur J Radiol.
2010;76:367-85.
24) Utsunomiya D,
et al.
Endometrial carcinoma in adenomyosis: assessment of myometrial invasion on T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images.
AJR.
2004;182:399-404.
25) Takeuchi M,
et al.
Differentiation of benign and malignant uterine corpus tumors by using proton MR spectroscopy at 3T: preliminary study.
Eur Radiol.
2011;21:850-6.
26) Tamai K,
et al.
MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls.
Radiographics 2005;25:21-40.
27) Takeuchi M,
et al.
Adenomyosis: usual and unusual imaging manifestations,
pitfalls,
and problem-solving MR imaging techniques.
Radiographics.
2011;31:99-115.