This poster is published under an
open license. Please read the
disclaimer for further details.
Keywords:
Dosimetric comparison, Diagnostic procedure, CT, Radioprotection / Radiation dose, Oncology
Authors:
E. Lekgabe, N. Tran, W. Cheung, B. McDonald, H. Kavnoudias, L. Hudson, X. Chen; Melbourne/AU
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2015/C-1895
References
1.
Yaniv G,
Portnoy O,
Simon D,
Bader S,
Konen E,
Guranda L.
Revised protocol for whole-body CT for multi-trauma patients applying triphasic injection followed by a single-pass scan on a 64-MDCT.
Clin Radiol.
Jul 2013;68(7):668-675.
2.
Nguyen D,
Platon A,
Shanmuganathan K,
Mirvis SE,
Becker CD,
Poletti PA.
Evaluation of a single-pass continuous whole-body 16-MDCT protocol for patients with polytrauma.
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
Jan 2009;192(1):3-10.
3.
Fanucci E,
Fiaschetti V,
Rotili A,
Floris R,
Simonetti G.
Whole body 16-row multislice CT in emergency room: effects of different protocols on scanning time,
image quality and radiation exposure.
Emerg Radiol.
Feb 2007;13(5):251-257.
4.
Ptak T,
Rhea JT,
Novelline RA.
Radiation dose is reduced with a single-pass whole-body multi-detector row CT trauma protocol compared with a conventional segmented method: initial experience.
Radiology.
Dec 2003;229(3):902-905.
5.
Huda W,
Magill D,
He W.
CT effective dose per dose length product using ICRP 103 weighting factors.
Med Phys.
Mar 2011;38(3):1261-1265.