1. American College of Radiology.
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) atlas.
5th ed. Reston,
Va: American College of Radiology,
2013.
2. Michaels AY,
Birdwell RL,
SungWon Chung C,
Frost EP,
Giess CS.
Assessment and Management of Challenging BI-RADS Category 3 Mammographic Lesions.
RadioGraphics 2016; 36:1261–1272.
3. Raza S,
Goldkamp A,
Chikarmane SA,
Birdwel RL.
US of Breast Masses Categorized as BI-RADS 3,
4,
and 5: Pictorial Review of Factors Influencing Clinical Management.
RadioGraphics 2010; 30:1199–1213.
4. Raza S,
Chikarmane SA,
Neilsen SS,
Zorn LM,
Birdwel RL.
BI-RADS 3,
4,
and 5 Lesions: Value of US in Management—Follow- up and Outcome.
Radiology 2008; 248:773–781.
5. Baum JK,
Hanna LG,
Acharyya S,
Mahoney MC,
Conant EF,
Bassett LW,
Pisano ED.
Use of BI-RADS 3 Probably Benign Category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial. Radiology 2011;260:61-67
6. McDonald ES,
McCarthy AM,
Weinstein SP,
Schnall MD,
Conant EF.
BI-RADS category 3 comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Radiology 207;285:778-787
7. Sickles EA.
Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology. 1991;179(2):463–468.
8. Lee CI,
Wells CJ,
Bassett LW.
Cost minimization analysis of ultrasound-guided diagnostic evaluation of probably benign breast lesions.
Breast J 2013