1 Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 2004; 233(1):19–34. Link, Google Scholar
2 Devi Wold AS, Pham N, Arici A. Anatomic factors in recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med2006;24(1):25–32. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
3 Li S, Qayyum A, Coakley FV, Hricak H. Association of renal agenesis and mullerian duct anomalies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24(6):829–834. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
4 Pittock ST, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Lteif A. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser anomaly and its associated malformations. Am J Med Genet A2005;135(3):314–316. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
5 Oppelt P, Renner SP, Kellermann Aet al.. Clinical aspects of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester-Hauser syndrome: recommendations for clinical diagnosis and staging. Hum Reprod2006;21(3):792–797. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
6 Kimberley N, Hutson JM, Southwell BR, Grover SR. Vaginal agenesis,
the hymen,
and associated anomalies. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol2012;25(1):54–58. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
7 Gell JS. Müllerian anomalies. Semin Reprod Med 2003;21(4):375–388. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
8 Buttram VC, Gibbons WE. Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (An analysis of 144 cases.) Fertil Steril 1979;32(1):40–46. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
9 The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions,
distal tubal occlusion,
tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation,
tubal pregnancies,
müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril1988;49(6):944–955. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
10 Deutch TD, Abuhamad AZ. The role of 3-dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of müllerian duct anomalies: a review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27(3):413–423. Medline, Google Scholar
11 Bermejo C, Martínez Ten P, Cantarero R et al.. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2010;35(5):593–601. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
12 Mueller GC, Hussain HK, Smith YRet al.. Müllerian duct anomalies: comparison of MRI diagnosis and clinical diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189(6):1294–1302. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
13 Robbins JB, Parry JP, Guite KM et al.. MRI of pregnancy-related issues: müllerian duct anomalies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198(2):302–310. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
14 Olpin JD, Heilbrun M. Imaging of müllerian duct anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009;52(1):40–56. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
15 Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17(6):761–771. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
16 Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7(2):161–174. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
17 Acién P. Incidence of müllerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod 1997;12(7): 1372–1376. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
18 Yoder IC, Hall DA. Hysterosalpingography in the 1990s. AJR Am J Roentgenol1991;157(4):675–683. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
19 Krysiewicz S. Infertility in women: diagnostic evaluation with hysterosalpingography and other imaging techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159(2): 253–261. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
20 Chandler TM, Machan LS, Cooperberg PL, Harris AC, Chang SD. Mullerian duct anomalies: from diagnosis to intervention. Br J Radiol2009;82(984): 1034–1042. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
21 Miller RJ, Breech LL. Surgical correction of vaginal anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2008;51(2): 223–236. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
22 Blask AR, Sanders RC, Rock JA. Obstructed uterovaginal anomalies: demonstration with sonography.
II.
Teenagers. Radiology1991;179(1):84–88. Link, Google Scholar
23 Strübbe EH, Willemsen WN, Lemmens JA, Thijn CJ, Rolland R. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: distinction between two forms based on excretory urographic,
sonographic,
and laparoscopic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol1993;160(2):331–334. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
24 Rosenberg HK, Sherman NH, Tarry WF, Duckett JW, Snyder HM. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: US aid to diagnosis. Radiology1986;161(3):815–819. Link, Google Scholar
25 Uğur M, Turan C, Mungan T et al.. Endometriosis in association with müllerian anomalies. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1995;40(4):261–264. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar