Keywords:
Cardiac, MR, Imaging sequences, Ischaemia / Infarction
Authors:
A. Damascelli, F. De Cobelli, A. Esposito, M. Cava, G. Benedetti, A. Durante, A. Colombo, P. G. Camici, A. Del Maschio; Milan/IT
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2013/C-1057
References
[1] Kloner R.
No-Reflow Phenomenon: Maintaining Vascular Integrity.
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2011
[2] van ‘t Hof AW et al.
Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade.
Zwolle myocardial infarction study group.
Circulation 1998
[3] Ndrepepa G et al.
Predictive factors and impact of no reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction,
Circ Cardiovasc Interv.
2010
[4] Klug G et al.
Prognostic value at 5 years of microvascular obstruction after acute myocardial infarction assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance,
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson.
2012
[5] Gibson CM et al: Relationship of the TIMI myocardial perfusion grades,
flow grades,
frame count,
and percutaneous coronary intervention to long-term outcomes after thrombolytic administration in acute myocardial infarction.
Circulation 2002