1.
Lakhani SR,
Ellis IO,
Schnitt SJ et al(eds): WHO Classification of Tumors of the Breast,
4th ed.
IARC Press,
Lyon,2012
2.
Hans-Peter Sinna,
Hans Kreipe.
A Brief Overview of the WHO Classification of Breast Tumors,
4th Edition,
Focusing on Issues and Updates from the 3rd Edition.
Breast Care (Basel).
2013 May; 8(2): 149–154.
3.
American College of Radiology:Breast Imaging Reporting and Date System.
5th edition,2013.
4.
Japanese Breast Cancer Society:The General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Recording of Breast Cancer.Jap J Surg,19:612-632,1989.
5.
Sakamoto Gogi.
Mammary tumor pathology atlas.
Shinaharashinsha Publishers,1987,29-36.
6.
Japanese Breast Cancer Society:The General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Recording of Breast Cancer The 18th Edition.KANEHARA & CO.
LTD,2018:24-64.
7.
Kamitani T,
Noguchi T,
Saku M,
et al.
Dynamic MR Mammography Differences of Time-intensity Curve Among Each Histology: Japanese Journal of Breast Cancer18(3):240-245,2003
8.
C A Hulka,
B L Smith,
D C Sgroi,
et al.
Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging.
Radiology 1995;197(1):33-38.
9.
Christiane Katharina Kuhl,
Peter Mielcareck,
Sven Klaschik,
et al .
Dynamic Breast MR Imaging: Are Signal Intensity Time Course Data Useful for Differential Diagnosis of Enhancing Lesions.
Radiology1999;211:101-110.
10.
Fischer,
U.,
Kopka,
L.,
Grabbe,
E.: Breast carcinoma; Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach.Radiology,
213,881-888,
1999.
11.
Sanaz A.
Jansen,
Xiaobing Fan,
Gregory S.
Karczmar,
et al.
Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Detected by Bilateral Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Sensitivity and Specificity Study.
Magn Reson Med 2008;59(4):747–754.
12.
Mitsuhiro Tosaki et al:Differentiation between Benign and Breast Lesions Detected by Bilateral Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI:A Sensitivity and Specificity Study.:Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 59:747-754,2008
13.
Tozaki M et al: AJR 193; 840-849,
2009
14.
Tozaki M et al: Positive and negative pre-dictive values of BI-RADS MRI descriptors for forcal breast masses.Magn.Reson.Med.,
5,7-15,2006
15.
S.Agliozzo et al:Computer-aided diagnosis for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI of mass-like lesions using a multiparametric model combining a selection of morphological,kinetic,and spatiotemporal features:Medical Physics,1704-1715,39-4,April 2012
16.
Mann RM et al: A novel approach to contrast-en-hanced breast magnetic resonance imaging for screening : High-resolution ultrafast dynamic imaging.
Invest Radiol49(9):579-585,2014
17.
A be H et al:Kinetic analysis of benigh and malignant breast lesions with ultrafast dynamic contrast-en-hanced MRI : Comparison with standard kinetic assessment.
Am J Roentgenol 207: 1159-1166.
2016
18.
Wendie A.
Berg,
Lorena Gutierrez,
Moriel S.
NessAiver,
et al.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography,
Clinical Examination,
US,
and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer.
Radiology 2004;233:830-849.
19.
Neha Bhooshan,
Maryellen L.
Giger,
Sanaz A.
Jansen,
et al.
Cancerous Breast Lesions on Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Images: Computerized Characterization for Image-based Prognostic Markers.
Radiology 2010;254(3):680-690.
20.
Yoshiaki M,
Nobuyuki T,
Tomomi T,
et al.
Computer-Aided Detection of Metastatic Brain Tumors in Magnetic Resonance Images.
Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology .
2108; 74(3) :251-261.